The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, such as the statement by the control police officer on the summary of the grounds of appeal and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the court below found the defendant not guilty of the facts charged in this case, which affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts and misunderstanding the facts.

2. The lower court found the Defendant not guilty of the facts charged of the instant case on the ground that it is difficult to view that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone proves that the Defendant intentionally committed an indecent act against the victim, as shown in the facts charged of the instant case, is insufficient to have been proven without reasonable doubt, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the victim’s written statement is inadmissible; (b) the Defendant’s distribution and parts of the body are confirmed only by the Defendant’s distribution and parts of the body are closely connected to the victim’s body; and (c) the above documentary evidence is taken only by the Defendant and the victim’s body parts.

Examining the above judgment of the court below in comparison with the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there is no error in the misapprehension of facts as alleged by the public prosecutor, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.