1. The Plaintiff; Defendant B law firm 25,972,379 won; Defendant C 3,964,188 won; Defendant D 1,335,374 won; and Defendant E 1.

1. Basic facts

A. I, J, etc. newly constructed three buildings (Ldong, Mdong, and Ndong) adjacent to the ground, including the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, by obtaining permission for construction as one building, and installing common facilities, such as power generator, water tank, etc., by distributed and installed the above buildings, thereby increasing the ratio of the area of the section for exclusive use. Accordingly, on March 19, 2002, the Ministry of Environment completed construction of the instant building with the permission of construction of the three-story reinforced concrete business facilities and the first-class and second-class neighborhood living facilities (hereinafter “the entire building of this case”), which are the total floor area of 15,789.37 square meters, around December 31, 2002.

B. Among the entire buildings of this case, Ldongs installed the fire-raising broadcasting equipment, fire-fighting pumps, electric power pumps, power generators, water tanks, water tanks, water tanks, and water tanks respectively, and Ndongs did not have common facilities, and the registration of initial ownership was completed on January 16, 2003 with respect to Ldong, Mdong, and Ndong respectively.

C. On March 31, 2003, J et al. established the Plaintiff for the management of the entire building of this case, and the sectional owners appointed J as the administrator of LA. The J entrusted the management of LA, and thereafter, the J managed the entire building of this case from around October 2017 to around around the time when the Plaintiff entrusted the management of LA to the Plaintiff, by employing electrical equipment engineers, etc. and by maintaining and repairing electric water facilities installed in LA.

On February 14, 2008, the appellate court did not recognize that the Plaintiff was delegated the N Consent Management or entered into a management contract with the N Consent Management Body, etc. on February 14, 2008, on the ground that the claim for the management expenses based on the management expenses agreement was without merit, but did not exclude the N Consent Cleaning and the expenses.