1. The defendant's notary public against the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party C is the law firm Gwangju-ro law firm on May 20, 2010.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff borrowed KRW 220,00,000 from the Defendant via D. In this regard, upon the commission of D and the Defendant, a notary public on May 20, 2010: (a) borrowed KRW 220,000 from the Defendant on March 5, 2010 as “No. 220,000 interest rate of KRW 20,000 from the Defendant on April 4, 2010; (b) borrowed KRW 220,000 from the Defendant on May 5, 2010; and (c) borrowed the Plaintiff’s debt jointly and severally; and (d) if the Plaintiffs fail to perform the said debt, C and D were to immediately object to compulsory execution, a notarial deed under a monetary loan agreement (hereinafter “notarial deed”) with the content that there is no objection.

B. On December 28, 2010, the Plaintiff agreed with the Defendant to pay KRW 220,000,000 of the borrowed principal to KRW 6,50,000 on the last day of each month from May 30, 201 to the installment repayment method (total amount of KRW 312,00,000). Under the above contract terms, the Defendant would postpone all recovery of claims to the Plaintiffs. If the Plaintiff did not perform the above matters once, it would lose the benefit of time and would not raise an objection to the Plaintiffs immediately.

C. From June 1, 2010 to November 12, 2014, the Plaintiff repaid total of KRW 96,400,000 to the Defendant on a total of 26 occasions as indicated in the following table.

Serial 1 0. 3,00,000 on June 1, 201; 20. 0. 3,000 on June 1, 201; 200 on July 23, 2010; 6,00,000 on August 6, 2010; 5,00 on September 3, 2010; 6,000 on September 3, 200; 6,00 on September 3, 200; 6,00 on September 20, 200; 6. 1, 200,00 on July 1, 201; 1, 200,00 on August 28, 200; 1, 2000; 3,00 on May 1, 201;