logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.09.10 2015나14140
위자료
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff was appointed as the president of the first council of occupants' representatives, the president of the first council of occupants' representatives, and the Dong representative of the 206 Dong unit, and the defendant is the occupant of the 201 unit of the apartment of this case.

B.1) On December 4, 2012, in collusion with D, E, and F on December 21, 2012, the Defendant sent a broadcast stating, “The illegal acts and interference with business of the head of the management office that occurred in the present apartment complex and the representative dismissed from office by using digital sound broadcasting devices are as follows. The suspension of business for the election management is an unclaimed management committee, and the president of the dismissed representative violates the management rules and fails to return his/her seal to the election management committee.” However, the fact was that the dismissal of the above representative of the apartment complex by the head of the management committee was decided with the consent of the majority of the household's individual visit voting during the period from September 19, 2012 to September 21, 2012, the Plaintiff rejected the removal of the representative from office from office due to the absence of a fair voting method from 10 to 210.21.21.207.

C. The defendant Na

In order to be sentenced to a summary order of KRW 300,000,000 upon summary indictment for the same criminal facts as stated in the preceding paragraph, the Suwon District Court filed a request for formal trial with the branch court of the Suwon District Court as 2014 high-level70, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 300,000 on June 27, 2014.

Although the defendant dissatisfied with this, the appeal (U.S. District Court 2014No3878) and the appeal (Supreme Court 2014Do17764) were all dismissed, the above judgment became final and conclusive.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 5 respectively.

arrow