1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of disposition;

A. On May 23, 2015, the Plaintiff, a foreigner of the nationality of the Russia Federation (hereinafter referred to as “ Russia”), entered the Republic of Korea as a sojourn status for visa exemption (B-1 and 30 days of sojourn) and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on July 27, 2015.

B. On July 12, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision on the recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that is a requirement for refugee status under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

C. On July 13, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on July 13, 2016, but was dismissed on December 7, 2017.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 2, Eul Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is a person of the nationality of the Russia from Russia, who is a foreigner in Russia, and is subject to intimidation's intimidation, which is called 'Sinz' due to the reason that the Russia is a foreigner, and is subject to demands and intimidation due to the fraud of a business partnership in Russia, and thus, there is sufficient concern that Russia may face imminent fear of gambling when returning to the Republic of Korea, and this is a reasonable fear, but the disposition of this case which did not recognize it on a different premise is unlawful.

(b) The attached Form of relevant statutes is as follows.

C. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions of evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and the purport of the entire pleadings, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff has “a well-founded fear of persecution on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion,” even if all evidence and arguments submitted by the Plaintiff were considered, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

① The Plaintiff at Russia.