The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On August 18, 2017, around 17:30 on August 18, 2017, the summary of the facts charged is whether the victim E (65 years of age) was working for the Defendant at the Gyeong-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

B. The Defendant, on the ground that she was sprinked to be sprinked, she would be unspicked, she would be spicked,” and the Defendant continued to display the victim as if she would go through the victim’s head part, and as she would be drinking, she would be sprinked, and the victim’s she would be sprinked, she would be sprinked off, she would be sprinked up, dead, dead, spacked, and sprinked up, and she will spick up in mountain, and she would be spick up.” The victim’s arms are sprinked, being towed into mountain, being towed into the victim’s body.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

In this regard, the victim expressed his intention not to be punished after the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.