A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 20:40 on September 30, 2016, the Defendant was driving a DNA cargo vehicle that was parked on the road adjacent to the south-gu, Southern-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and came to depart from the YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY.

Since there are other vehicles parked at the same time, there was a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to live well on the front side and the left side and to accurately manipulate the steering gear so as not to be faced with a parked vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant got the back portion of the Firing Passenger Vehicle, which is the victim E, parked forward of the cargo vehicle, by negligence not seeing the front and left left and left, and received the back portion of the Firing Passenger Vehicle, which is the victim E, which was parked in front of the cargo vehicle, and due to the shock, the Firing Motor Vehicle was stated in the victim G bill that was parked in that front of the bill as “E” and the victim’s name, which is the owner of the Hir Cargo Vehicle, is the same as “E,” but each vehicle owner is recognized as another person according to each comparison (Evidence No. 22 and 23 of the Evidence Record).

In order to distinguish the victim who is the owner of the two vehicles, the name of the victim, who is the owner of the HPoter cargo, shall be indicated as “G” as above.

In order to have the owner of H Poter Cargo part of the left side of the H Poter Cargo and to have an amount equivalent to KRW 2,313,177 of the repair cost, H Poter Cargo Vehicles were destroyed to have an amount equivalent to KRW 258,578 of the repair cost, and they escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures.

In the written indictment submitted by the victim J, which was parked on the road in front of the I coffee specialty store with approximately KRW 800 meters away from the negligence that the Defendant continued to proceed without sufficiently examining the right and the right and the right, the Defendant stated the name of the victim, who is the owner of the K-learning passenger, as M, as “M”, but it is evident that there is a clerical error in the “J” according to the following comparison (Evidence No. 24 of the Evidence Record)

Defendant

Since there is no particular problem in guaranteeing the right of defense, it is corrected ex officio.