logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.11.22 2017고단841
사기
Text

The defendant is innocent. The defendant shall dismiss the application for the compensation order of this case.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) on July 3, 2008, the Defendant entered “D” goods of the victim B, which caused KRW 30,000 per day of hospitalization of injury; (b) on January 21, 2009, the victim E’s “F” goods for which hospitalization medical expenses are paid on January 21, 2009; (c) the victim’s “H” goods for which KRW 40,000 per day of hospitalization of injury on July 28, 2009; and (d) the victim’s “H” goods for which KRW 60,000 per day of hospitalization is paid on the same day.

After being hospitalized for a long time as it does not need to be hospitalized or longer than necessary, the Defendant had received proper hospitalized treatment, and had received the above victim insurance company receive insurance money and received it by fraud.

The defendant from February 18, 2010 to the same year.

3. Until April 15, 300 won, 750,000 won, 30,210,010 won, 960,210 won, 20,210 won, and 960,000 won, 750,000 won, 750,000 won, 750,000 won, and 2,010,210,00 won, and 750,000 won, 70,000 won, and 750,000,00 won, and

However, at the time of this case, the Defendant was hospitalized in order to receive insurance money without requiring long-term hospitalization.

In addition, the Defendant was hospitalized in total 46 times from the above day to April 11, 2016, and was paid a total of KRW 196,288,960 from the victims as insurance money.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings victims, and acquired the above KRW 196,288,960.

2. The defendant's assertion and judgment

A. The summary of the argument is consistent with the hospitalization of the Defendant as stated in the facts charged of the instant case, but it does not make a false symptoms or make excessive hospitalization, and thus there is no intention to commit fraud against the Defendant.

B. Determination 1) The Defendant is identical to the facts charged in the instant case.

arrow