1. For each item listed in the separate sheet (except Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 17, 22):

A. Defendant A Law Firm.

1. Facts of recognition and judgment

A. On February 2, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) borrowed KRW 151,690,000 from the Plaintiff on February 3, 2015, by a notary public of the South-Seoul Joint Law Office No. 185, from the Plaintiff; (b) decided to pay KRW 10 million on February 3, 2015; (c) KRW 10 million on February 20, 2015; and (d) KRW 41,699,00 on March 20, 2015; and (c) written a notarial deed of a monetary loan agreement to recognize that there is no objection if the said monetary obligation is not performed, even if compulsory execution is carried out.

In order for E to fulfill the above monetary obligation, the Plaintiff was granted an execution clause on March 23, 2015 and seized each object listed in the attached Table on June 18, 2015.

On the other hand, E, along with F, purchased each item listed in the attached Table, such as the shock rink, etc. (other than Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 17, 22) from the Plaintiff who handles air conditioners and their related products on January 29, 2015, when opening the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu G and 1st floor 2 and 33 air conditioners, and installed the said money loan notarial deed on the price of the goods.

In addition, the plaintiff, E, and F provided that the ownership of each of the above goods shall be the plaintiff until all of KRW 151,690,000 (including value-added tax) is paid in accordance with Article 5 of the sales contract for each of the above goods.

After the Plaintiff’s seizure of each of the items listed in the separate sheet as above, on August 7, 2015, Defendant A additionally seized each item listed in the separate sheet based on the executory exemplification of No. 387 on August 7, 2015, where the debtor is the law firm E.

In addition, on August 27, 2015, Defendant B attached each object listed in the separate sheet on the basis of the executory exemplification of notarial deeds No. 176 of the Seoul Joint Law Office No. 176 in South-Seoul Joint Law Office on August 27, 2015.

In addition, on June 30, 2015, Defendant C’s provisional attachment of corporeal movables on June 17, 2015, where the debtor is E on June 17, 2015.