(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.09.20 2018고단899

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.09.20 2018고단899

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The defendant shall pay 7,80,000 won to the applicant C for a compensation order. The defendant shall be the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On July 11, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud in the Jinwon District Court’s Jinju branch, and completed the execution of the sentence in Daegu Prison on July 4, 2015.

【Criminal facts】 2018 Highest 899】

1. Fraud;

A. On August 13, 2015, the Defendant, at around 11:00 on August 13, 2015, told the victim E to sell the clock with approximately one million won to the clock and sell the clock to the clock in the PC in the Daegu-gu Incheon-dong-dong. “Around August 13, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement on the part of the victim E to transfer the clock (any group created by the people who enjoy the same Internet game on the Internet) of the clock game that he/she holds.

However, even if the defendant has received a clean franchise from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to deliver the sales proceeds to the injured party after selling the clean franchise to the third party.

The Defendant was transferred a large amount of KRW 1 million at the market price on the same day from the injured party.

B. From August 30, 2016 to September 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) contacted the victims that the Defendant purchased Twit diskettes from the Internet in a high-speed foreign carpet; (b) made the victims buy the diskettes by false means as if they were sold, and (c) made the victims transfer money under the name of sales proceeds; and (d) F would take the role of withdrawing money when remitting the damaged money, by deceiving the victims of money from the victims and consumed it as daily expenses.

Around August 28, 2016, the Defendant posted the victim G on the Internet NAV and the country car page "to purchase H contact pockets", and falsely told the victim "to contact the victim with the victim by using the mobile phone (I) in the F's name."

However, in fact, since the defendant did not have a tweet from the beginning, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the tweet to the victim.

The defendant shall be F.m. on the same day in the name of the sale price of tweet from the injured party.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.07.01 2016고정120

-인천지방법원 2018.12.12 2018고단6273

-인천지방법원 2017.10.19 2017고단2993

-청주지방법원 2016.01.28 2015고단1734

-인천지방법원 2017.04.26 2017고단535