logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.12.20 2017고단2244
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On July 19, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Jeju District Court, and a summary order of KRW 3 million for the same crime at the same court on October 21, 2010, respectively.

[2] On August 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a Crocketing car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.156% from the 2km section to the 192 km road in the same Si-ro, the same Gu-based Do-ro, from the Round-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-ro to

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (A), and Acts and subordinate statutes (Attachment to the previous and copy of judgment);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44-2 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (the fact that the defendant is against his gender, the fact that the punishment of a fine for drinking driving in the past has been imposed two times, but the defendant's child lives without any particular criminal act during the past seven years, the defendant's child was under contact with high-speed emergency situations and was driving in order to return home to home, and thus some of the motives are considered, and the defendant's workplace may lose his position if the defendant is selected according to the internal regulations of the defendant's workplace, and in such case, it seems that the defendant who supports the wife and three children seems to be somewhat harsh results);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow