beta
Text
No. 1-A of the judgment of the defendant
Section 1-B of the Resolution, with respect to a crime committed in two months of imprisonment.
each of the crimes and the second crimes of its holding.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 24, 2011, the Defendant sentenced the Seoul Southern District Court to four months of imprisonment for the obstruction of performance of official duties, and completed the execution of the sentence in Seoul Southern Prison on November 1, 201.
1. Interference with business;
A. On March 22, 2011, at around 11:30, the Defendant: (a) 5-dong Office of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, expressed a prudent with a large voice, “Chewing gue, irrehy,” and (b) obstructed the bus operation of a person without a name, by preventing the operation of the bus for about five minutes, such as blocking C buses driven by the person with a name failure on the front of the Dong Office of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, and preventing the operation of the bus for about five minutes.
B. On April 2012, at the entrance of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ddong, the Defendant expressed to the Defendant that the victim E (the age of 47) said D security guards called “I cannot have access to D” on the ground that “I can no access to D in the state of drinking,” and obstructed the Defendant’s work in total over six months from the end of April 2012 to September 2, 2012, as indicated in the separate sheet, the victim “I am this son, friend, DNA friend, DNA friend, DNA friend, DNA friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, etc. on the floor, thereby obstructing the victim’s work of maintaining order and customer guidance.
2. At around 22:40 on June 16, 2012, the Defendant made a public insult of the victim G by stating that “I would have six police officers of the said police officer, including H, etc., who heard that I would have the said police officer to file a petition from G when he was driven voluntarily in the said district, by drinking in the F District of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, by stating that “I would have to go to Y, I would have to go to see, I would have to go to see, I would have to go to see, I would have to go to see, I would have to go to see, I would have to go to see.”
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. The police statement of I, J, E, G, and K;
1. The investigation report on Mar. 22, 11.3. Traffic obstruction.