logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.09.28 2017고정700
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 10, 2011, the Defendant appeared as a witness of civil procedure, such as the remaining purchase and sale price No. 23633, at the Suwon District Court in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si. 120, the Defendant took an oath and took an oath.

As the principal lawsuit of the Plaintiff C, Defendant D and E agreed to pay 1/2 of the F Loans from the Plaintiff to Defendant D and E in lieu of the payment of the remainder amount, by purchasing from the Plaintiff F Loans from the Plaintiff, and paying 1/2 of the F Loans from the Plaintiff in lieu of the payment of the remainder amount. Defendant D concurrently acquired the remainder amount.

As to the claim for partial payment of compensation for expropriation, the Defendants entered into a joint investment agreement with the Plaintiff, as a counterclaim, to invest KRW 125 million in the land site and its ground housing (hereinafter “G housing”) in the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Sungnam-gu, which is Defendant E-owned, and divide the proceeds therefrom into 1/2, but the Plaintiff did not pay the investment money. The Plaintiff claimed that, as the registered owner of the above building site and housing lent the money as a collateral, H borrowed the money as a offset against the Plaintiff’s claim, the amount of settlement, etc. after setting off the offset against the Plaintiff’s claim.

The defendant was a broker for the sale and purchase of F housing and the testimony of the defendant on the existence of an investment agreement on each of the above housing was an important assessment.

1. On May 18, 2007, the Defendant testified to the Plaintiff C’s agent’s testimony as “for example,” the question of whether there was no talk about the investment agreement between the parties to a sales contract, and whether a mere real estate sales contract was concluded.”

However, the Defendant discussed the investment agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants at the time of the sale and purchase contract of F Housing.

2. The Defendant’s agent for the Plaintiff C’s lawsuit “F 1 real estate (F Housing).”

arrow