logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.08 2016가단7409
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 2,361,588 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the amount from November 21, 2015 to December 8, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. (1) The Plaintiff is a personal business operator engaged in the business, such as automobile glass construction, with the trade name of “C”, and entered into a franchise agreement with the Plaintiff’s headquarters and the Defendant as a master franchisee on October 25, 2013 regarding the said business. The main contents of the franchise agreement are as follows (hereinafter “instant franchise agreement”).

(2) No separate chain store shall be set aside in the same business district (within 1 K m in radius) for the purpose of protecting the business district of eight areas (excluding additional map omitted) located within the 00-day franchise store. (2) The head of the headquarters shall only use the name of the store "Creri". (2) the head of the headquarters agrees to use its trade name and trademark (mark) in the area where the head of the franchise runs. The franchise store under Article 4 (Design of Equipment Cost) shall, in principle, be set up at 100-day franchise store: 100-day franchise store and 100-day franchise store and 200-day franchise store and 30-day franchise store and 130-day franchise store and 130-day franchise store and 130-day franchise shall be charged by the head of the franchise. The remaining 10-day franchise shall be set at 300,000-day franchise and 1300-day franchise and 200-day franchise.

arrow