logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.04.04 2017고단4588
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 21, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny in the Busan District Court’s subsidiary branch on July 21, 2016 and completed the execution of the sentence in the Incheon Detention House on November 28, 2016.

On July 5, 2017, at around 12:30 on July 12:30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) placed the victim D and his employees in the “C Mart” on one floor of the “C Mart,” which was located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and caused the victim’s property to be stolen by putting one d4,00 won of the market value of the damaged person who was in the food display stand, due to the distribution management, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Previous convictions: Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and an investigation report (report on confirmation of the period of repeated crime period);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. Application of the sentencing guidelines [the types of crimes] thieves thieves thieves thieves thieves thieves thieves thieves thieves thieves thieves thieves thieves thieves thieves

2. Considerations, such as the fact that there was a history of punishment for the same criminal record as the sentence has been imposed several times for the same criminal record, the fact that the criminal defendant committed the crime of this case without being able to do so during the period of repeated crime due to the same criminal record, the fact that the criminal defendant led to the crime of this case, the amount of damage is relatively small, and the immediate recovery of damage has been made (a punishment less

arrow