beta
Text
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) shall deliver to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) the motor vehicle indicated in the separate sheet.
2...
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On October 17, 2017, the Plaintiff heard from C the phrase “I would pay monthly installments every month if I would obtain installment loans in the name of D and purchase a heavy vehicle.” The Plaintiff purchased a vehicle listed in the attached Table (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) in the name of the Plaintiff, and completed the procedure for the registration of vehicle transfer, and received KRW 30 million in the name of the Plaintiff and delivered it to C.
B. Around October 28, 2017, upon accessing the Internet site “D”, posted a notice to the effect that “The instant vehicle will be sold at KRW 14 million in the Plaintiff’s name,” and that the Defendant, who called to C, did not set a collateral security right to ask whether the said vehicle was set up, would sell the said vehicle at KRW 12 million.
The defendant has transferred KRW 12 million to the Plaintiff’s account designated by C, and has taken over the instant vehicle and has possessed it up to now.
C. C:
(a).
As described in paragraph (1), by deceiving the plaintiff and deceiving the plaintiff, 30 million won of the installment loan, by deceiving the defendant, by deceiving the defendant, by deceiving the plaintiff, and by deceiving the plaintiff to sell 12 million won of the middle and high-class loan, instead of scambling, it was prosecuted and sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor by deceiving the plaintiff to sell scambling machines and by deceiving the plaintiff.
[The Pyeongtaek District Court Decision 2017Da2431, 2018 Godan17, decided February 21, 2018 (merged)] D.
The following fines for negligence and unpaid tolls were imposed on the instant automobiles.
(1) Administrative fines for delay of a motor vehicle inspection conducted on July 11, 2018 (2)
E. The defendant is "E".