logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.07.17 2014고단591
자동차손해배상보장법위반등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of 5,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

▣ 피고인 A 피고인은 2014. 4. 18. 울산지방법원에서 절도죄 등으로 징역 1년을 선고받아 그 판결이 그 무렵 확정되었다.

The defendant of "2014 Highest 591" is a holder of G Clar 300C passenger cars and H H SBB passenger cars.

No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, on May 31, 2009, the Defendant operated the said G car on five occasions in total by not later than November 28, 2009, including the operation of the said G car, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at around 01:11, in the mid-to midland 38.5km (Tgu-Masan), and operated the said G car on five occasions by not later than November 28, 2009, as stated in the attached list of crimes committed in the annexed list. On August 19, 2010, the Defendant operated the said H car at the 32.2km direction of the Daegu Busan Busan Busan Highway.

"2014 Highest 1314"

1. The Defendant, while running a credit business under the name of I, was engaged in the business of lending money as security to the automobile and trading the automobile that received as security.

At the end of December, 2011, the Defendant purchased the K ASEAN A6 car owned by the J in front of the National Bank of the Republic of Korea near the Haak-dong of the Haaknam-si in the Haaknam-si.

The defendant has a duty of care to clearly confirm the process of acquisition by the transferor through the transfer of ownership or the owner in case of the difference between the transferor and the owner of the vehicle in performing the automobile transaction business.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and arbitrarily disposed of through LA which entered into a lease agreement with the said owner, and purchased the said AD A6 car, an embezzlement, at the cost of KRW 15 million.

Accordingly, the Defendant acquired stolen property by violating the duty of care as above.

2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. The Defendant was in possession of M in a Buddhist land in January 2012.

arrow