The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal asserts that the punishment imposed by the lower court (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized his mistake and reflected his mistake, and that some of the damaged goods have been returned.

However, the crime of this case is a case where the defendant intrudes into each office operated by the victims at night and habitually steals money and valuables worth KRW 3,300,000 in total. The defendant has already been punished several times due to the same crime, in particular, even though he had committed the crime of this case even though he had been committed for a repeated crime due to the same crime, there is no change in circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the court below, and other circumstances that form the conditions for the arguments of this case and the sentencing specified in the records, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered as inappropriate.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.