beta
Text
1. As to Plaintiff A, the Defendant: (a) KRW 84,704,60; (b) KRW 58,136,400; and (c) KRW 58,136,400; and (d) each said money, from January 29, 2018 to 20.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The parties concerned are corporations operating the D Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and the network E (FFs; hereinafter “the deceased”) is a person who died on January 29, 2018 after the Defendant’s hospital went into effect on January 25, 2018, and died on January 29, 2018. The Plaintiff is the deceased’s spouse and the Plaintiff’s mother.
B. On December 29, 2017, the Deceased’s head of the Defendant Hospital and the Deceased’s head of the deceased’s death 1. On December 29, 2017, 2017, the Deceased went away from the stairs of his home located in Gangnam-si, with the first floor. From December 30, 2019 through G Hospital on December 30, 2017, the Deceased’s head of the Defendant Hospital was transferred to the patient room, and the brain CTR was diagnosed as a result of brain dysical damage, acute hysical hysical damage, and hysical hysives were installed after the operation to remove 30cc of the deceased’s brain hys from the right side of the deceased’s brain at the Defendant Hospital. In accordance with the opinion of the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital, it was difficult to explain to the Deceased on January 5, 2018 that it was necessary for the Deceased’s head of the 2015 repulmon.
3) After an engine renovation, the deceased’s condition was improved, on January 29, 2018, and around 15:30 on January 29, 2018, the deceased died on the same day on the condition that a large quantity of blody cloot was observed. At around 16:05, a large quantity of blody clody was generated on the part of the body part of the deceased. At around 16:05, a large quantity of blody clody was continuously decreased, and the heart was suspended due to the continuous decline of blood pressure. However, the deceased died on the same day at around 17:43.
C. As a result of the autopsy on the deceased, the direct death of the deceased was “damage to scarbly pulse” after the death of the deceased, and the preceding deather was confirmed as “scarbly bruculing.”
Plaintiff
The Plaintiff A and the Defendant Hospital Medical Doctor A, on August 1, 2019, died of the medical team at the Defendant Hospital and the Deceased.