The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Facts charged;

가. 피고인은 2016. 3. 중순경 자신이 운영하고 있는 거제시 B에 있는 ‘C’ 사무실에서, 사실은 피해자 D이 약 20년 전 E 대표로부터 후원금 명목으로 받은 500만원을 가로 채 임의로 사용한 사실이 없음에도, 마을 사람 F에게 “ 약 20년 전 D이 마을 이장으로 있을 때 G 마을회관을 신축하는데 후원금 명목으로 E에서 현금 500만원을 받아 가로챘다.

It is why such a change of fraud has been supported by the village head at once.

The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts, such as “the”.

B. On May 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 20:10, at the seat of the meeting of the Second Village Operations Committee of G community hall; and (b) at the time of the construction of the G community hall for about 20 years before the victim D, the Defendant did not arbitrarily use the 5 million won received as a support payment from E during the period of the new construction of the G community hall for about 20 years; (c) in the absence of the 7 community residents, he/she saw that he/she would not receive five million won from E at the time of the establishment of the community hall.

evidence.

The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts, such as “the”.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act.

C. On February 22, 2017, after the prosecution of this case, a statement of revocation of complaint stating that the victim's prosecution order does not want the punishment of the defendant

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;