The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The judgment below

In the column of evidence, “written inquiry, such as criminal history,” shall be made.

The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment imposed by the court below (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, but in full view of various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in this case, it is not recognized that the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable because the punishment imposed by the defendant is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument is without merit.

Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is evident that the entry of "written reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, and the result of the prisoner's search" is omitted in the column for the evidence of the court below. Thus, it is corrected ex officio by adding it in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure