beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 227,031,956 with the Plaintiff, and Defendant B with respect thereto from December 30, 2015, and Defendant C with respect to the Plaintiff on December 30, 2015.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is the party’s position 1) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s factory site in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si Do, 358.6m2 and three-story factories on its ground (hereinafter “instant damaged factory”).
(2) As the owner of the instant plant, the Defendant C is a person who is engaged in electronic parts, equipment manufacturing and service business, etc. using the trade name “E” in the instant damaged plant. (2) The Defendant C is a person who was the owner of the instant damaged plant, a factory and office, a multi-dong warehouse, a water level room and office, and a factory (a multi-dong building is deemed to have been connected to one building, and a total of the buildings referred to as “instant building”).
B. 1) The second floor of the instant building and the rooftop of the instant building are G (a lessee under a lease agreement is the H) the former owner of the building.
Defendant C purchased the instant building on May 16, 2014 under the condition that he/she succeeds to the above lease agreement and thereafter, the same year.
7.1. Completion of the registration of ownership transfer.
2) On June 8, 2015, G requested Defendant B to remove automationd facilities and waste, etc. installed on the second floor of the instant building on June 11, 2015, in order to recover and return the leased object upon termination of the said lease agreement. 3) Defendant B performed the removal work on June 14:47, 2015 using an oxygen cutting machine, etc. on the second floor of the instant building.
However, Defendant B did not take safety measures such as checking of inflammable substances in the vicinity or covering the safety board to prevent the melting fire with inflammable substances from sprinking around. During the process, there was a fire that sprinks fire with sprinkling dust accumulated in the sprinking work unit (hereinafter “instant fire”).
4. The instant building was removed from the instant fire, and as the fire spreads, the instant building was located in the neighboring site.