logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.09.02 2019고단2646
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2019. 5. 5. 19:45경 부산 금정구 B에 있는 ‘C식당’에서, ‘시비가 붙었다’는 손님의 112 신고를 받고 출동한 부산금정경찰서 D지구대 소속 경위 E이 혼자서 술을 마시던 피고인을 위 주점 밖으로 데리고 나가 귀가를 권유하였으나 계속하여 위 주점 안으로 들어가려고 하였고 위 E이 계속하여 피고인을 제지하자 이에 화가 나, “내가 왜 집에 가는데, 갈 이유가 없다, 야이 새끼들아, 내가 뭘 잘못했느냐, 씹할 놈들, 경찰관은 돌아가라, 사고 터지면 출동해라, 야이 짜바리 새끼야”라는 등의 욕설을 하면서 손날로 위 E의 목 부위를 2~3회 치고, 주먹으로 위 E의 배 부위를 2~3회 때리고, 손으로 위 E의 머리채를 잡아 흔드는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the G production;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. The reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the “justifiable circumstances”) of the suspended sentence.

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for not less than one month but not more than five years;

2. Scope of recommendations according to the sentencing criteria: From six months to one year and six months (decision of type): The obstruction of the performance of official duties [Article 1] the obstruction of the performance of official duties [Article 1]/ the coercion of official duties [Article 1] [Scope of recommendations and recommendations] basic area: Imprisonment with labor for six months to one year and six months.

3. A crime that interferes with the performance of official duties by a police officer of a sentence requires strict punishment even in order to establish a state’s legal order and eradicate the light of public authority.

However, the defendant seems to have led to confession and reflect on the crime of this case.

under the influence of alcohol.

arrow