logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2020.04.13 2020고단73
특수공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On January 19, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for the crime of indecent act by force at the Sungnam branch of the Suwon District Court on January 19, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on October 9, 2019.

【Criminal Facts】

On November 24, 2019, the Defendant reported that “The Defendant 119 phone calls using a mobile phone from the Mancheon-si located in the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do,” and that “The fire captain E (ma, South, 33 years old) belonging to the Do Safety Center of the 119 Emergency Medical Center was dispatched to the Gacheon-si B apartment and C, but the Defendant’s sentence residing there was no open space and the hospital treatment is not wanting.”

Accordingly, E calls the Defendant and explains, “I cannot move to force because I do not have any open place, and I do not want to transfer a hospital,” the Defendant should gather and move back to E, which is a dangerous object (23 cm in total length, 10 cm in blade) entering the above apartment as well as on the upper part of the living room on the same day at around 18:10 on the same day after he called as “I will die in a knife and die in a knife.m.” The Defendant must do so at large 18:10 on the same day, and 10 cm in a knife and knife in a knife and knife in a knife in a knife.m.

m. At one original macker, this macker macker, which was released from the inside of the Republic of Korea, so long as it was collapsed at the time of release from the Republic of Korea

마. 내가 뭘 잘못했는데, 이게 죄가 될 것 같아 "라고 말하여 위협하였다.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and thereby interfered with the performance of official duties by threatening fire officers who perform the duty of 119 declaration processing.

The defendant asserts that a fire officer had no desire to take the same way as the above facts constituting the crime, and that there was no intimidation against a fire officer.

However, the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court is as follows.

arrow