A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B(n, 22 years old) are the relationship between the shesheshesheshesheshes and the victim(s) of the remarried family.

On February 2, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 02:00, the Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, the Defendant: (b) reported that the victim was locked; (c) took the clothes of the victim on one hand; and (d) taken the son’s knife with his hand; and (c) taken the knife the knife of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim in a state of impossibility of resistance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on D message defendants and defense counsel asserted that the defendant was placed on the victim's chest while he was lying on the victim's chest, and that the victim's chest did not intentionally put his finger into the victim's clothes.

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., ① the victim made a very specific and consistent statement on the situation at the time of the damage in the investigative agency and this court; ② the entrance door of the room at which the victim occurred; and the other dynamics of the victim were the victim at the inside of the room; and the defendant went home immediately after drinking her friendship with her her fris, and then her locked in the middle. According to the victim’s statement, the above room is relatively broad, and when the defendant returns her body, it is deemed that the defendant was not well-founded to the extent that the her son goes back to the chest of the victim; ③ the defendant was found to have taken the chest of the victim, and ③ the victim’s “whether the son was a son.”

“The question” refers to the statement that “if the victim is unable to speak at all times due to a locking,” under the premise that he was unsatisfing, she is the rearer, and she is about the other slick side, and as alleged by the Defendant, she is aground on the victim’s chest with clothes on the locking side.