beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B’s KRW 30,000,000 and for this, KRW 5% per annum from December 30, 2013 to May 28, 2014.
Reasons
Based on the facts, Defendant B was appointed as a public official around March 10, 2004 and served as a public official from January 10, 2013 in the Department C of the Agricultural Technology Institute under the Defendant Jeju Special Self-Governing Province (hereinafter “Defendant Jeju-do”).
The plaintiff is engaged in agriculture in the dry field located in Seopopo City D.
Defendant B has forged relevant documents using that he is a public official of Defendant Jeju-do, and had the Plaintiff receive money for the purpose of acquiring money under the name of the facility fee project cost, etc., and had the Plaintiff find the subjects to implement the facility fee-making project that is supported by the government subsidy as the pilot project of creating the foundation for production of the Armotopos in 2013.
It is also possible to plastic houses under installation.
If the plaintiff pays only 30% of the self-paid charges, the remaining amount can be supported by the national subsidy. Thus, it is intended to apply for the national subsidy by finding out whether the head of the Tong containing the self-paid charges is in the face of a week.
The term "highly" was ‘highly.
Accordingly, on December 30, 2013, the Plaintiff issued to Defendant B the passbook and password, which contain KRW 30,000,000 of the self-paid amounting to 100,000,000 of the total construction cost.
Defendant B transferred the above KRW 30,000,000 to his own account on the same day.
However, there was no national support project as above.
[Based on recognition, the Plaintiff and Defendant B: The Plaintiff and Defendant Jeju-do: (a) lack of dispute; (b) Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2-1 through 184; (c) Gap evidence Nos. 3-1 through 28; (d) Gap evidence Nos. 4-1 through 5; (e) Gap evidence Nos. 5, Eul evidence Nos. 8-1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 9; and (e) Eul evidence Nos. 10-1 through 12; and (e) Defendant B, who are public officials of Jeju-do, who are the Plaintiff’s assertion of the purport of the entire pleadings, received the State subsidy related to facility Nos. 30,000,000 from the Plaintiff while performing their duties.
The defendant B's act constitutes a tort, and local governments are also local governments.