A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. When the Defendant came to know that the Victim B was a criminal issue of the Victim B’s children, he was able to make a solicitation to the prosecutor, and was able to do so as to have an effect on the investigation agency, and received money from the victimized person.

The defendant, around April 25, 2008, intends to resolve the victim's criminal problem in the coffee shop near the D hotel located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

It is intended to solve necessary expenses.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant receives expenses from the injured party, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to cancel the number of the injured party's children or resolve the criminal problem.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received three million won from the injured party on the same day from the injured party, and received two million won from the same place on August 20, 2008 at the same time and received two million won from the same place.

2. The Defendant conspired with F, and the Defendant was aware of it in collusion with F.

F and F had the mind of receiving money from the injured party by driving as if they were capable of solving the criminal problem.

On August 13, 2009, the Defendant and F introduced F to the victim at the same place as indicated in paragraph 1 of around August 13, 2009, the Defendant and F explained F as if F could resolve the criminal problem as the prosecutor's office and the court entrance. The Defendant and F explained F to the effect that F would do so as to be the entry of the prosecutor's office and the court and to solve the criminal problem.

However, even if F does not have access to the prosecutor's office or the court and received money from the injured party, the F did not have any intent or ability to resolve the problem, and the defendant was well aware of such fact.

The defendant and F, as above, deceiving the victim and they belong to this.