1. The Defendants are Seoul Central District Court Decision 2014Gahap29365, 2014Gahap4732, Nov. 5, 2014, with respect to the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

The status network E of the parties (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) had Nonparty F and G as their children between the Plaintiff, who was the wife, and died on May 14, 2010.

The non-party limited liability company established on September 1, 1973 for the purpose of operating a funeral hall (hereinafter referred to as “H”) was the representative director from September 7, 1982 to April 15, 1998, and the Plaintiff is the current representative director.

The Defendants filed a lawsuit against the Deceased for damages by Seoul Central District Court 2002Gahap57619 against the Deceased.

On September 10, 2004, the above court sentenced the defendants to "E shall pay 850,000,000,000 won to the defendants and damages for delay," and the above judgment was finalized on January 20, 206.

As the plaintiffs died on May 14, 2010 and the deceased died, the plaintiff, G, and F, the inheritor of the deceased, filed a report on the inheritance recognition with Seoul Family Court Decision 2010Ra6065 on July 19, 2010, along with the list of inherited property attached hereto, and the above court accepted the above report on the qualified acceptance on August 4, 2010.

The Defendants’ executive titles against the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking damages against the Plaintiff, F, and G, the deceased’s heir, for the interruption of extinctive prescription against the claim pursuant to the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2002Gahap57619, Seoul Central District Court Decision 2014Gahap29365, 47332 (combined).

After closing the argument on October 8, 2014, the foregoing court accepted the Plaintiff’s assertion on qualified acceptance on November 5, 2014, and sentenced the Defendant to “within the scope of the property inherited from the Deceased, the Plaintiff shall pay the Plaintiff KRW 364,285,714 and any delay delay damages therefrom” (hereinafter “instant judgment”). The instant judgment became final and conclusive on December 12, 2014.

The Defendants, based on the executory exemplification of the instant judgment, are subject to compulsory execution against the land indicated in paragraph (1) of this case (hereinafter “instant land”).