logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고단2589
협박등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of nine million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment on October 10, 2013 for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.) in the Busan District Court’s Vice-Support on August 10, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence on August 3, 2015 by the Gwangju District Court.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant, on October 6, 2016, is a victim D (n, 58 years of age) serving as an employee in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon on Oct. 6, 2016, in E-cafeteria, and is a large sound to the side tables customers under the influence of alcohol.

C. C. H. H. H. the year following the end of the year, “I.D.h.h.,” and the victim’s restaurant business was obstructed by force between about 20 minutes by avoiding disturbance, such as threatening customers to see their hands, and threatening them to see their will, as the victim was faced with the removal from the victim, and making the removal from the victim, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A statement F and D;

1. Notice of 112 Reporting, investigation report, and photographs of the site;

1. Previous convictions: Investigation of criminal history, investigation report (verification of crimes during the repeated crime period), sentence and confinement status of the judgment, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes reporting the results of previous convictions of the disposition;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the choice of fines (limited to a repeated crime during the period of repeated crime; however, the defendant showed both recognition of and reflects on the criminal facts; and there is no record of punishment due to interference with business, etc.);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged (2016 highest 2589) stated that the Defendant: (a) around April 11, 2016, around 04:20, the Defendant: (b) opened the entrance door by the victim I ( South, the age of 27) at the same public notice telecom in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, and the second floor H public notice around 04:20 on April 11, 2016; and (c) opened the victim’s door to the victim’s room for visiting the victim, and (d) viewed the victim’s door to the victim’s door “I’s stroth defect, a scark, and a kick.” (c) 5 minutes.

arrow