All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

The judgment below

The "victims" shall be referred to as "victims" in the 3rd and 11th conduct.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 피고인 ⑴ 사실 오인 또는 법리 오해 ㈎ 준강간의 점에 대하여 피해자가 원심 판시 제 1 항 기재 일시 및 장소에서 피고인과 성관계를 할 당시 심신 상실이나 항거 불능의 상태에 있지 않았고, 설령 그렇지 않았다고

Even if the Defendant was in a state of mental or physical loss or impossibility to resist;

did not recognize it.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which convicted the quasi-rape is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts or in the misapprehension of legal principles.

㈏ 각 피 감독자 간 음의 점에 대하여 피고인이 원심 판시 제 2 항 기재 각 일시 및 장소에서 피해자와 각 성관계를 한 것은 위력을 행사하여 한 것이 아니라, 합의 하에 한 것이고, 설령 그렇지 않았다고

Even if the defendant believed that there was an agreement at the time of the above sex relationship, the defendant was believed to exist.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found all of the facts guilty between supervisors is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts or in the misunderstanding of legal principles.

The punishment sentenced by the court below against the defendant (three years of imprisonment, etc.) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence, which the court below decided against the defendant, is too unhued and unfair.

2. Determination

A. The lower court also asserted the same purport as the grounds for appeal in this part, and the lower court’s judgment on the grounds for appeal on the part of the lower court’s 6th page or 12, regarding the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel.

2. The part of the “determination on quasi-rape” was presented in detail and rejected the above argument.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the judgment of the court below and the court below in comparison with the evidence duly adopted and examined, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there are errors as alleged by the defendant.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.