Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
(a) The name of the Defendant’s registered device 1: Date of filing of an automobile package 2)/ Date of registration/registration number: Claims B/C/D3: 【Claims 1” (hereinafter “Composition 1”) with the upper part (110) formed by multiple holess (112) to ensure that foreign substances, such as dust, are introduced.
(112) The tet(120)(hereinafter referred to as “Composition 2”) with a size corresponding to upper tet(110) and with a formation of multiple tet(122) through which foreign substances introduced through the tet(112) are expropriated.
(i) contain each vertical tape (11)(121)(1)(121)(1)(121)(hereinafter referred to as “Composition 3”) attached mutually to the edges of upper and upper sets (110) and lower parts (120);
(112) The joints (112) formed in upper sheetings (110) are broad from the upper surface of the upper sheeting, they are separated from each other in a narrow upper luminous converging shape with the upper luminous converging shape (hereinafter referred to as “converging 4”).
(ii) If the edges of the upper sheet and the lower sheet are attached to a tape (111)(1)(121)(1)(12), foreign substances from the holes of the upper sheet that are formed at the upper sheet (112) and the lower sheet (122) cannot be flowed between the upper sheet and the lower sheet (hereinafter referred to as “Composition 5”) due to the inflow of foreign substances from the holes of the upper sheet into the upper sheet.
[Attachment 1] Main Drawings for Motor Vehicles: 【Request 2, 3] and 4: as shown in [Attachment 1].
(hereinafter referred to as the “instant registered petition”). B. The Defendant’s registered petition
The description and drawings of the complaint subject to confirmation by the defendant of the complaint subject to confirmation are as specified in attached Form 2.
C. On March 26, 2014, the Defendant filed a petition against the Plaintiff for an affirmative confirmation of the scope of rights (No. 2014Da760) by asserting that the instant petition falls under the scope of rights in the instant petition for registration.
On September 30, 2014, the Korean Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board does not correspond to the free licensing technology.