A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On January 20, 2015, around 19:50, the Defendant met the Defendant’s attempt to assault E in front of the Kimhae-si B apartment 304, the 1112-report, and the C District Assistant Police Station affiliated with the Kimhae-si Police Station, which received the 112-report, and he met the Defendant. The Defendant called the said D, “Nebbbbbbbs,” and carried the Defendant’s left left side of the said D, which arrested a flagrant offender due to the obstruction of performance of official duties.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers in the suppression and prevention of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Attachment of a victim's DNA damage photograph);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. The dismissal of prosecution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. On January 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 19:50 on the street in front of the Kimhae-si B apartment 304, the Defendant: (b) reported the victim E (the 27-year-old) who parked and parked the vehicle without any justifiable reason under the influence of alcohol; (c) took a bath to the victim; and (d) on the ground that the victim is complying with the foregoing, the Defendant died of the fluor test; and (e) died of the fluor, having the fluor, having the fluor, having the fluor, died of the fluor; (e) fluor, having the fluor, having the fluored; and (e) fluored the fluor, having the fluor

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the victim by walking the back of the body of the body of the Defendant, continuing to walk the body of the body of the Defendant, so far as it is difficult to capture the body of the Defendant into the body of the Defendant.

2. This part of the facts charged is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since a written agreement stating the victim’s expression of intent not to punish the defendant was submitted on June 29, 2015, this part of the indictment is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The reason for sentencing.