The punishment of the accused shall be determined by three years and six months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who served as a general member of the South-North Factory C located in the Gwangju Mine-gu and retired around December 26, 2016.

The Defendant, based on his wife and other family members as an automobile employee, continued to need the amount equivalent to the benefits to be transferred to an account in order to see as if he received benefits from a car, and invested in stocks with money from his family members, but suffered a big loss, the Defendant attempted to obtain money from the victims, who are the employees of the above company, as if they were to raise a large amount of income from stock investment through the father, who is a small father, who is an employee of the above company, under the pretext of stock experts, and receive money under the pretext of stock investment, and then receive money under the pretext of the so-called return, and transfer money as part of the profits for the invested amount as a profit, or borrow money from family under the pretext

On December 3, 2015, the Defendant served as the victim D, who is a company partner at the Korean vehicle industry (ju) factory located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City, for a securities company located in Seoul.

One professional fund called "E" as a lux interest asset manager that has contributed to stock broadcasting is working as a member of the lux group, while investing in shares of a group in China, and working as a real estate auction expert, making a lot of money.

It has been paid a lot of monthly revenue by investing in a small father, and the apartment has been owned by two bonds.

When investing money to a small father, the 6% of the monthly income shall be paid, and the principal shall be paid more or more than twice after one year.

However, the above-mentioned father was the person who was the father of the small child, and the defendant was the person who was the father of the small child, and the defendant was not a professional knowledge about the investment of stocks.