1. The Defendant’s KRW 64,759,885 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 20% per annum from February 4, 2014 to September 30, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition [the fact that there is no dispute: Gap evidence 1, evidence 2-19, evidence 3-40 through 43, evidence 4 through 8-46, 63, 73, Gap evidence 10, 11, and evidence 33 through 37, and the purport of the whole pleadings];

A. From July 2009 to April 2013, the Plaintiff engaged in the original supply transaction with the Defendant. On the order of the original unit in Korea, the Defendant ordered the original unit to the Plaintiff by the head of the Chinese branch office or the person in charge of the original unit production, who is an employee of the Defendant’s local factory in China. Accordingly, the Plaintiff, after the formation of the original unit, requested the Plaintiff to color the original unit in response to the Defendant’s demand, supplied the original unit with the original unit in color as the salary supply box designated by the Defendant. If the Plaintiff presented the original order to the head of the branch office and the person in charge of the original unit production, etc. of the Defendant’s Chinese branch office, the head of the Chinese branch office, etc. to which the Defendant belongs, signed the factory certificate by receiving it from the head of the Defendant.

(hereinafter “instant transaction”). B.

In relation to the instant transaction, the following settlement was made between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

1) A) On October 6, 2011, the Defendant’s personnel in charge of the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff a document stating the purport that USD 191,253.85 and USD 447.30 among them would be carried over, and around October 6, 201, the total amount to be paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff as of October 6, 201.

B) Meanwhile, the Plaintiff’s transaction account book with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant transaction account book”) between July 2009 and August 2013, 2013, which ceased transaction with the Plaintiff from July 2009 to August 2013.

According to the instant transaction account book, the Defendant’s payment of the original amount that was not paid on September 23, 201 is the same as the above amount that was paid by the Defendant from September 24, 2011 to October 11, 2011.

(C) On October 6, 2011, the Plaintiff’s total amount of USD 191,253.85 and KRW 447.30 to the Defendant.