1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff alleged that he lent KRW 50 million to the defendant on June 7, 2006, and the defendant is obligated to pay 50 million won and delay damages to the plaintiff, the defendant asserted that he had a duty to pay 50 million won and delay damages to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff lived with the defendant about 2006, and the defendant was only lent the passbook to C, and there was no kind of relationship with the plaintiff. Thus, the defendant did not borrow the above money from the plaintiff.

2. According to the reasoning of the judgment below, Gap 1-1 and 2, it can be acknowledged that the plaintiff's Nong Bank account was paid in the name of the defendant on June 7, 2006, and KRW 10 million on June 8, 2006 in the plaintiff's Nong Bank account. However, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff lent the above money to the defendant, and there is no other evidence to support this otherwise, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.