1. The Defendant’s disposition of determining a disability grade against the Plaintiff on February 18, 2016 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. During the process of cutting the subsidiary materials of the panel established in the ceiling by being employed as a wooden course at the factory extension construction site executed by the construction company, the plaintiff was faced with an accident where he was involved in beer (hereinafter referred to as the "accident in this case") between the handbagr and the handbagr, the face left side part and the arms on the handbager (hereinafter referred to as the "bagr").

As a result, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “the instant injury and disease” (hereinafter referred to as “the instant injury and disease”) of the heart, the right-side 1 balance, the first balance of the inner part of the upper part of the upper part of the earth, the inner part of the left-hand side, the inner part of the upper part of the earth, and the inner part of the upper part of the earth, and the Defendant’s medical treatment from July 10, 2015 to January 16, 2016 upon obtaining medical treatment approval from the Defendant.

During the medical care on July 10, 2015, the term “the first fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral part of the left side,” respectively, was implemented on July 27, 2015, and on August 13, 2015.”

On January 2016, the Plaintiff filed a claim for disability benefits with the Defendant on the ground that the Plaintiff has a disability of “the 7 cms on the left-hand side’s inner part of the 1st balance of the official duties and pains, and the reflect of the left-hand side’s inner part.”

On February 18, 2016, the defendant decided the disability grade under class 10 of class 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "disposition in this case") to the plaintiff on February 18, 2016, that "The defendant decided the disability grade under class 10 of class 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "disposition in this case") to the effect that "the chest ples of the side of the face is less than 2m wide, 7m length, 50/0 of the balance of the right-hand 1 balance, 60/0 of the surrounding part, and the movement scope of the right-hand 1 balance falls short of the standard."

Although the Plaintiff filed a request for examination against this, it was dismissed on June 24, 2016, and again filed a request for reexamination, but it was also dismissed on November 2, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 8, purport of the whole pleadings

2. This.