Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is an insurance solicitor of interesting country life and teaching culture life. From March 2010 to February 2013, the Defendant was a school meal staff member of the Daegu C High School School Governance Committee, and was a regional member of the operating committee of the same school from March 2013 to February 2014.

C High schools entrusted the provision of school meals to an external meal service company, so that schools around January and February every year set up and publicly announced a plan to select a school meal service supplier in accordance with the school meal service guidelines of the Daegu Office of Education, and received an application from the entrusted meal service company, and set the order of the company by visiting the first evaluation of the company's proposal for the entrusted meal service in the school meal service subcommittee comprised of parents and teachers, etc., and visiting the school meal service subcommittee and determining the order of the company through the second on-site evaluation of sanitation conditions, massage, work process, etc., and finally, the school principal selected the entrusted meal service provider by determining the entrusted company.

In addition, even after a school meal service company was selected, the school operation committee members, school meal facilities members, dietitians, etc. were employed from 3 to 9 months each month, and two months to 10 to 2 months each month, and the school meal service company was supervised and managed by the entrusted school meal service company.

Therefore, the defendant was in the position of dealing with administrative affairs related to supervision after the selection and appointment of entrusted school meal service companies of C High School.

2. Criminal facts;

A. The Defendant in breach of trust had a meal service company enter into an insurance contract with the meal service company in return for providing convenience in business in return for solicitation of continuing school meal services from the meal service company, and had the service company acquire pecuniary benefits, such as allowances in accordance with the insurance contract performance.

The defendant.