beta
Text
1. A distribution schedule prepared on May 31, 2013 by this Court with respect to the Suwon District Court D or E (Dual) auction cases of real estate.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On October 4, 2007, FF registered the creation of a neighboring mortgage of the Plaintiff, etc. was registered with the Plaintiff, G, H, H, I, J, K, K, L, M, and N on the 4,309 square meters (the land registered with P forest No. 4,374 square meters on July 2, 2010; hereinafter “instant real estate”) of the maximum debt amount with respect to the 4,309 square meters of P forest No. 4,374 square meters (the land registered with P forest No. 4,374 square meters on July 2, 2010), the debtor, F, the Plaintiff (75/2,000 shares), G (75/2,00 shares), I (150/2,00 shares), J (6/2,00 shares), K (150/2,00 shares), K (104/2,000 shares), M/20 (M/200 shares), and M/20 (300 shares)/20 shares.
B. The Defendants agreed to lend money to F as KRW 670,00,000 on May 19, 201 and KRW 670,000 on May 19, 201 to F with interest rate of KRW 2.5%, and the Defendants agreed to pay the principal amount of KRW 1,005,000,000, including penalty and penalty for breach of contract, if they fail to pay within one year, and the interest rate of KRW 2.5% on June 15, 201 shall be calculated and paid KRW 160,00,000 on February 5, 201. The Defendants agreed to lend the principal amount of KRW 160,00,000 including penalty and penalty for breach of contract where they fail to pay within one year, and the interest rate of KRW 240,000,00 including penalty and penalty for breach of contract shall be calculated as KRW 240,000,00 on February 25, 2012.
(2) On May 19, 201, in order to secure each of the instant loans, the Defendants: (a) transferred shares of the instant mortgage from H, I, J, K, K, L, and M each of the instant loans; and (b) completed the supplementary registration of the transfer of the right to collateral security on the grounds of partial transfer of the contract.
B. The progress of the voluntary auction procedure and the objection 1) The auction procedure of the instant real estate was conducted as D to this court with respect to the instant real estate with G’s request for auction, and the decision of commencement of auction was rendered in duplicate with the Defendants’ request for auction (hereinafter “instant auction procedure”).
In the auction procedure of this case, this case.