logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2020.05.13 2020고단73
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2020. 1. 29. 01:00경 경북 포항시 남구 B에 있는 C편의점 앞에서, ‘손님이 행패를 부린다’는 내용의 112신고를 접수하고 현장에 출동한 경북포항남부경찰서 D파출소 소속 경위 E으로부터 소란을 피우지 말고 귀가할 것을 요청받자, 위 E에게 ‘씨발 개새끼, 짭새 새끼, 좆같은 새끼, 어이 머리 하얀 영감 새끼야’ 등의 욕설을 하면서 오른손으로 위 E의 왼쪽 뺨을 1회 잡아당기는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of the people's lives, bodies and property, and the prevention of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A written statement;

1. Each internal investigation report and each investigation report;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a branch of a police box, video recording, or CD;

1. Relevant statutory provisions for criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, the choice of fines (the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties is a crime that undermines the function of the State by nullifying a legitimate exercise of public authority, and thus, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant in order to establish a legal order of the State and eradicate the light of public authority. However, the defendant is dissipated and contradictory to his mistake, there is no previous fault in the past, there is no crime committed in 2000, with the exception that he was sentenced to a fine exceeding 300,000 won for a violent crime, and there is no criminal record exceeding a fine since 200, and the degree of the assault

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow