A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 7, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of two million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and on November 18, 2009, the Cheongju District Court issued a summary order of five million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Cheongju District Court.

On November 16, 2015, the Defendant driven a vehicle from approximately 7km to 0.229% of alcohol concentration in the blood, in the direction of Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Masan-si, Masan-ro, Goi-si, Cheongju-si, the Defendant driven a vehicle from the 7km section of 1099 to the front road of the Yandong-gu, Cheongju-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. The actual survey report and photographs;

1. Notification of the results of regulating the driving of drinking alcohol and a statement in the circumstances of the driver of drinking alcohol;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of the inquiry letter (A)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. The reason for the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as "the grounds for the suspended sentence") is as follows: (a) even after June 1, 2006, there was a record of having been punished by a fine on three occasions by driving alcohol and refusing to measure drinking once again; (b) the Defendant committed a crime of the same kind without being aware of the fact that there was a high drinking level; and (c) the Defendant committed a crime of the same kind in depth; (d) the Defendant committed an unfavorable mistake, such as the fact that drinking has high drinking value; (e) the Defendant took advantage of the favorable circumstances such as supporting the preparation and study of employment for children through the public office life; and (e) other favorable conditions of the sentencing as shown in the argument of the instant case, such as drinking alcohol, etc.