A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle with C low Pest another car.

On February 7, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.073% from blood transfusion around 18:30 on February 7, 2017, and led the front of the road in Daegu-gu D to the direction of the flow from the boundary of the village market.

In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering area and the right and the right and the right of the driver and accurately manipulating the steering direction and the system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and negligently stopped in the state of being drunk, caused the victim F (36 years old) driver's G 1ton driver's vehicle of the victim F (36 years old) who stopped in the state of being drunk, to have the front side of the Defendant's vehicle, and due to the shock, caused the victim H (37 years old) driver's vehicle to have the front side of the above cargo vehicle.

In sum, the Defendant, by negligence in the above business, suffered from the victim F the victim F with approximately two weeks’ base of salt, etc., which requires approximately two weeks’ medical treatment, and the victim H suffered from the injury of acute fluoral base of salt, which requires approximately two weeks’ medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of F and H prepared;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving, a survey report on actual condition, and the application of statutes in each written diagnosis;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 3 and Article 44 (1) of the Traffic Act (the point of drinking), Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (between the crimes of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents) ;

1. In cases of crimes violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents at the option of punishment, punishment of imprisonment without prison labor shall be imposed, and punishment shall be imposed upon the crimes violating the Road Traffic Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 38 (2), and 50 of the said Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is as follows.