1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. With respect to C and D vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”), the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded each automobile insurance contract with respect to E vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. On April 13, 2019, at around 18:10, the Defendant’s wife driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle and went along the two-lanes of the three-lane distance intersection without signal lights in front of the Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G Building, and the Defendant’s front side of the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle and the front side of the Plaintiff’s driver’s seat, who turn to the left on the back road, faced with the accident.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

On May 2, 2019, the Plaintiff paid KRW 10,033,637 to the Plaintiff’s insurer for the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition: Facts without dispute; Gap evidence or Gap evidence; Gap evidence or Gap evidence 7; Gap evidence or Gap evidence 9 through Gap 12; Eul evidence or Eul evidence 1 through 7; the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments]

2. Assertion and determination

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant accident occurred due to the former negligence of the Defendant’s driver. As such, the Defendant, as an insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle, is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the insurance proceeds for the entire damage of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and to pay the Plaintiff the amount of indemnity equivalent to KRW 10,03,637 of the insurance proceeds, which has been acquired by

B. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of each evidence cited in paragraph (1) of the judgment, the instant accident was caused by the negligence of the driver of the Defendant vehicle who left left the back on the back side without properly examining the progress situation of the vehicle adjacent to the intersection without signal lights. However, it is reasonable to view that the F’s negligence contributed to the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damage.

The background of the instant accident, the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the Defendant’s vehicle.