(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.06.13 2017고단705

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.06.13 2017고단705

상습사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 1, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. in the Jinyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court on September 1, 2015, and was sentenced on October 16, 2016, and was punished with the same criminal records on October 27, 2016.

1. On February 21, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim C: (a) appears to have an attitude as if he would normally pay the alcohol value; (b) the Defendant ordered the employees to provide alcohol and alcohol, etc.; (c) however, the Defendant did not have an intent or ability to pay the alcohol value normally.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and provided 436,00 won to the injured party.

2. On March 1, 2017, the Defendant, who committed the crime against the Victim F, showed an attitude that the Defendant would have paid the normal drinking value in the “H main point” managed by the injured party on the first floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul Gangnam-gu G G 1, as if he were to pay the normal drinking value, and the Defendant ordered the said employee to provide alcohol, alcohol, etc., but did not have an intent or ability to pay the normal drinking value.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and provided the victim with an alcoholic beverage and an alcoholic beverage equivalent to KRW 480,000.

3. On November 29, 2016, around 22:00, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim I at K points in the operation of the victim in Gangnam-gu Seoul Gangnam-gu, Seoul, with the same attitude as paying the price to the victim without the intent or ability to pay the price properly even if he/she orders the alcohol and the alcohol, and the Defendant issued an order to pay the price to the victim. The Defendant acquired the victim with the 60,000 won and 4:70,000 won and 6:00 won and 6:0,000 won from the victim.

In this respect, the defendant had been informed of the victims habitually and received property from the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C, F, and I.

유사 판례

-제주지방법원 2019.01.07 2018고단1553

-대구지방법원 포항지원 2018.07.19 2018고단511

-울산지방법원 2018.06.12 2018고단455

-대구지방법원 안동지원 2020.02.18 2019고단781

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.05.31 2013고단100