logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2013.04.17 2013고단30
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 10 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant in the name of “E” in Masan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si.

A person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall not make a false indication of the place of origin or make an indication likely to cause confusion therewith.

From January 22, 2011 to March 17, 2012, the Defendant purchased 2,597.8kg from the G’s mutual meat wholesale store of “F” to KRW 8,500 per kilogramg, and sold 2,587.8kg of Germany’s swine powder with the country of origin indicated on the said establishment as domestic acid, and stored 10k of Germany’s swine powder in the air conditioners for the purpose of selling remaining 10k of Germany’s swine powder.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. Partial statement of a witness I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on field photographing photographs;

1. Articles 15 and 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant’s assertion on the Defendant’s assertion of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to be admitted to the Nowon-gu Labor Relations Commission was used until January 201, 201, which was at the time of sale of domestic swine scrap machines, and the said Qua New Markets were not used any longer, and only used to keep them below the calculation unit, and that the imported swine scrap was written by replacing the Qua New Markets after January 201. As such, there was no false indication of origin on the swine scrap.

According to the following facts admitted by the above evidence adopted by this court, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted, since the defendant's conviction is recognized.

① The Defendant, while replacing all of his domestic swine plates used until January 201, 201, at the time of the sale of the domestic swine scrap machines, was either replaced by the calculation unit without being replaced by a somewhat more.

arrow