logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.01.17 2017나308529
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 17, 2016, the Plaintiff purchased 25,000,000 won from Defendant B, via the brokerage of Defendant C, a licensed real estate agent, for the purchase of KRW 25,00,00,00 for three parcels, including Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and No. 202, No. 201 (hereinafter “instant housing”).

(hereinafter “instant sales contract”). B.

The Plaintiff paid all the purchase price to Defendant B by November 16, 2016, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant housing on the same day.

Defendant B transferred the instant house to the Plaintiff on November 21, 2016.

C. On November 22, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) requested the te (hereinafter “instant construction business entity”); (b) the construction of a small channel mold, design construction, and market construction on the second floor; and (c) the Plaintiff was found to have the water leakage of the main part of the 2nd floor bank due to the 3rd floor bed and falling short of waterproof.

The Plaintiff requested Defendant B to bear construction costs through Defendant C, and Defendant B shared KRW 1,200,000 for construction costs related to water leakage in the second floor, including replacement of the third floor bel and waterproof construction.

On November 28, 2016, water flows out from the boiler of the instant housing, and upon the Plaintiff’s request, the Defendants replaced the boiler of the instant housing by bearing KRW 1,00,000 (Defendant B KRW 300,000, Defendant C700,000).

E. On November 30, 2016, the Plaintiff made malodor in the instant housing room, the second floor bath, and the third floor bath, etc., and requested construction to prevent malodor from the instant construction business entity. On December 30, 2016, the instant construction business entity installed “bits”, which is a device blocking malodor in each toilet against the second floor bath and the third floor bath.

F. On December 2016, 2016, the Plaintiff opened a cooling valve at the lower end of the third floor bathing room in the instant housing site. However, the lower part of the said valve continued to leak a small amount of water.

G. On December 11, 2016, the Plaintiff is at the three-story bath room of the instant housing, the water level of which is lower than the second floor.

arrow