A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 13, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant at one time on July 21, 2015, at the right time, on the left side of the slope, when the drunk was sent to the northwest Police Station C police box belonging to the Ponding Police Station of the Ponding Ponding Ponding Ponding Ponding Ponding Ponding Ponding Ponding Ponding Ponding Ponding Ponding on the front side of the northwest-gu Ponding 203.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers in relation to the handling of reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and E;

1. Relevant Articles 136(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (referring to six months of imprisonment or one year and four months of imprisonment) for the obstruction of performance of official duties (limited to a special person who has been sentenced] [decision of sentence] unfavorable circumstances: The defendant has the record of having been punished for violent crimes, including the suspension of execution, and other favorable circumstances that have many records of having been punished for violent crimes: The assault was committed only once, and the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties is not particularly significant; there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine after having been sentenced to a suspended sentence of 13 years prior to the suspension of execution; and there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine; and there is a violation of mistake;