beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2014 Highest 1413"
1. On February 17, 2012, the Defendant, who committed the crime on February 17, 2012, called the victim’s immediate crypt loan to the employee in charge of the name in charge of the victim’s direct crypt loan, and called “on November 5, 2014, the Defendant leased KRW 5 million to the employee in charge of the victim’s immediate crypt loan, with the principal and interest each month until November 5, 2014.
“.....”
However, at the time, the Defendant was liable to pay approximately KRW 51 million, and most profits were used to repay the existing debts, and there was no intention or ability to pay the above loans.
Defendant was transferred KRW 5 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (C) in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the injured party’s end of the foregoing false statement.
Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take the property by deceiving the victim.
2. The Defendant and D, and D, and E, of the Defendant on July 12, 2013: (a) at the early top of the police station on July 12, 2013; (b) D, a mortgage on a new purchased motor vehicle; (c) by deceiving a lending company to have the lending company pay the purchase price of a motor vehicle in lieu of the purchase price of a motor vehicle; and (d) the sales company of a
E delivers the above vehicle to the defendant without establishing a mortgage in the name of the lending company, and the defendant shared the roles of selling the above vehicle to the third party, and agreed to divide the sales proceeds.
D On July 12, 2013, in the non-permanent restaurant near Pyeongtaek-si apartment that is easy to move, it is intended to purchase “Motor vehicle number(G)” to the employee in charge of the victim non-Scub Capital Co., Ltd., and if the loan of KRW 20 million in the purchase price of the vehicle, it is intended to set up a mortgage on the said vehicle and pay the principal and interest for 60 months thereafter.
“.....”
However, in fact, the defendant, D, and E purchased the above vehicle with the loan, and sold it to a third party in the state of not creating a mortgage in the name of the victim, as well as D at the time.