logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.11.06 2013고정628
청소년보호법위반
Text

A fine of two million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who manages the general affairs of the office in the position of the head of office at the D main office located in the 3rd floor of the office in Bupyeong-si, Nowon-gu.

Despite the fact that the business owner of a juvenile harmful business establishment does not employ a juvenile, the defendant employed the juvenile E (18 years of age, female) who was found through the Internet Abane job site as a entertainment entertainment loan for the above entertainment drinking house between 02:00 on December 31, 2012 and 04:30 on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A E-document;

1. Copies of the business license certificate;

1. Control photographs;

1. Photographs (juvenile and Handphones);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of resident registration;

1. Relevant Article 58 of the Juvenile Protection Act and Articles 58 subparagraph 4 and 29 (1) of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defense counsel's assertion of the defense counsel in Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that although the defendant employed E as a entertainment drinking house entertainment drinking house entertainment drinking house entertainment drinking house entertainment drinking house entertainment drinking house entertainment drinking house entertainment drinking house entertainment drinking house entertainment drinking house, the defendant was found to have employed E after confirming that E is not a juvenile via the resident registration certificate presented by E, and the defendant had

In the first time, the defendant made a statement to the effect that he had become a male guest and the remainder of five contact loans are not a contact loan employed by the above main points in case of E (the investigation record 30th 6th 6th , the 32th 2nd , the 35th 2th , the 35th 2th ), and the 3 persons including E in the report office, and the 3 persons except for E among other contact loans made by the other report office in the F report office, and the 3 persons other than the F report office in the other report office were made, and the 99th 18th , the 100th 2nd , etc. of the investigation record) are consistent.

arrow