A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 7, 2013, at around 18:24, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the Defendant, i.e., the Defendant: (b) on the front side of the D-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu, with the Defendant’s address being confirmed by leaving a phone at the earth to assist the Defendant in getting home to a taxi for business use and getting the Defendant returned to the taxi for business use; (c) while the Defendant was able to use the phone at the earth’s address; (d) the Defendant was f

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports and the maintenance of order by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning editing of field CCTV data;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment (it shall be considered that there exists any record of punishment that the accused has been punished in multiple times of violence);

1. It is determined as above in light of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized, there is no past and criminal history of punishment, the fact that the above crime is committed by an accident by drinking, the aged, and the fact that a number of diseases are suffering, etc.) of the suspended execution.