logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.01.17 2018가합206930
청구이의
Text

1. Certificate No. 1143, 201 drawn up by the Defendant’s notary public against the Plaintiff on October 14, 201, No. 1143 of the Joint Law Office.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff and the defendant were born from March 2004 to de facto marital relationship, and the plaintiff and the defendant were born since D.

B. On December 21, 2007, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff for damages on the ground of an unfair reversal of a de facto marriage relationship by the Seoul Family Court Decision 2007Dhap14612, and on September 26, 2008, the conciliation of the following (hereinafter “the first conciliation”) was established on September 26, 2008 (hereinafter “instant first conciliation”); and the protocol following the conciliation was “the first conciliation protocol”).

1.(a)

The defendant shall be designated as a person with parental authority and custodian of the principal of the case (E, hereinafter the same shall apply).

C. The defendant waives the plaintiff's claim for child support for the principal of the case later.

2.(a)

The plaintiff shall pay 2.7 million won in total to the defendant as a total of consolation money, division of property, and future child support, and the remaining 1.8 million won shall be paid until September 30, 2008, and the remaining 1.8 million won shall be paid until March 31, 2009. If the payment is delayed, the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 10% per annum from the day following the payment date to the day of full payment shall be paid.

4. The Defendant and the Plaintiff waive all additional claims related to divorce, such as solatiums, division of property, child support, etc., against each other after the date the instant conciliation is completed, and there is no dispute (including both civil, criminal, and household affairs, but excluding preservative measures, enforcement procedures, etc. due to the Plaintiff’s failure to pay money or delay in performance as stated in paragraph (2) above).

C. The Plaintiff paid KRW 90,000 to the Defendant around September 30, 2008, but did not pay the remainder of KRW 180,000,000 until the due date.

On October 14, 2011, a notary public signed a notarial deed of debt repayment contract (hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”) with the following content as the document No. 1143, 201, which was signed between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

Article 1 Obligors (Plaintiffs, hereinafter the same shall apply) are not more than the Defendant.

arrow